International Journal of Political Science Studies https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS <p><strong>International Journal of Political Science Studies</strong> is a peer-reviewed academic journal that covers a wide range of topics related to political science and international relations. The journal published by FortWorth Peer Reviewed Journals and Book Publishers and is available online and in print. The journal aims to provide a forum for scholars, researchers, and policymakers to share their research and insights on a range of political science and international relations topics, including democracy, governance, conflict resolution, international relations theory, and comparative politics.</p> FortWorth Peer Reviewed Journals and Book Publishers en-US International Journal of Political Science Studies The Impact of Immigration Policies on Social Cohesion in European Countries https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/16 <p><em>In the face of increasing global migration trends, the role of immigration policies in shaping the social cohesion of European countries has become a pivotal concern for policymakers, scholars, and communities alike. The intricate interplay between policies governing the movement of people and the resultant impact on the unity and integration of diverse populations within European nations forms the focal point of this study. As the demographic landscape undergoes transformations, understanding the dynamics of how immigration policies contribute to or hinder social cohesion is essential for informed policy decisions and the fostering of inclusive societies. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of immigration policies on social cohesion in European countries. This study was anchored on the Social Identity Theory (SIT). </em><em>The study conducted a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing scholarly works related to </em><em>the impact of immigration policies on social cohesion in European countries. </em><em>This multifaceted process entailed reviewing a diverse range of academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other relevant publications, to acquire a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge within the field. Through a systematic exploration of the literature, researchers gain insights into key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge, which subsequently informs the development of the research framework and questions. The synthesis of findings from the reviewed studies on the impact of immigration policies on social cohesion in European countries reveals nuanced relationships between policy frameworks and social cohesion outcomes. Inclusive immigration policies consistently contribute positively to social cohesion, fostering unity and integration, while restrictive policies correlate with social exclusion and intergroup tensions. The significance of policy design in shaping the social fabric is underscored, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and leveraging cultural diversity for cohesive societies. Moreover, the multifaceted nature of this relationship, influenced by economic, psychological, and temporal dimensions, calls for a holistic and context-specific approach to immigration policy formulation. The conclusion highlights the need for policymakers to adopt inclusive frameworks that consider diverse factors influencing social cohesion. The studies contribute theoretically by grounding findings in Social Identity Theory, elucidating the mechanisms through which immigration policies shape social identities. From a policy perspective, the evidence emphasizes the pivotal role of inclusive policies in fostering unity, providing valuable guidance for policymakers. The call for context-specific policy formulation and consideration of economic and social dimensions offers nuanced insights for effective policy design, contributing to both theoretical understanding and actionable guidance for policymakers within the complex European socio-political landscape.</em></p> Scott Silveri Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Political Science Studies 2024-01-18 2024-01-18 1 1 1 12 Media Influence on Public Opinion and Political Decision-Making https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/17 <p><em>In the ever-evolving landscape of modern politics, the role of media influence has become increasingly crucial, shaping not only public opinion but also wielding a profound impact on the decisions made by political actors. This study delves into the intricate dynamics between media content, public perceptions, and the subsequent implications for political decision-making, contributing to our understanding of the complex interplay that underlies contemporary democratic processes. The general purpose of this study was to explore the media influence on public opinion and political decision making. This study was anchored on the Agenda-Setting Theory. </em><em>The study conducted a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing scholarly works related to </em><em>media influence on public opinion and political decision making. </em><em>This multifaceted process entailed reviewing a diverse range of academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other relevant publications, to acquire a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge within the field. Through a systematic exploration of the literature, researchers gain insights into key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge, which subsequently informs the development of the research framework and questions. The studies on media influence, public opinion, and political decision-making collectively emphasize the significant impact of media framing on shaping public attitudes, influencing political candidates, and setting policy priorities. These effects extend globally, observed not only in Western democracies but also in post-conflict societies like South Africa. Social media platforms play a crucial role in shaping public discourse and influencing political decisions. The literature stresses the importance of media literacy to mitigate biased effects, highlighting the need for educational interventions. Cross-national studies reveal both universal patterns and distinct regional variations in media influence, underscoring the complex and multifaceted nature of this interplay. Overall, the findings stress the need for nuanced approaches in understanding and navigating the dynamics of media influence, public opinion, and political decision-making. The Agenda-Setting Theory is empirically supported, emphasizing the media's gatekeeping function in determining issue salience. Policymakers are not only influenced by public opinion but also consider media narratives, emphasizing the interconnected nature of media, public opinion, and political decisions. Ethical journalism and media literacy are crucial for ensuring the integrity of information influencing political choices. From a policy perspective, it calls for regulatory frameworks promoting fair media coverage and emphasizes the importance of media literacy initiatives. The findings extend to the discourse on social media's role, offering insights into information dynamics and suggesting guidelines for ethical online political discourse. In summary, the study enhances theoretical understanding and provides practical implications for policymakers, media practitioners, and educators to improve public discourse and political decision-making in contemporary democracies.</em></p> Charles Okechukwu Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Political Science Studies 2024-01-18 2024-01-18 1 1 13 24 The Role of Soft Power in International Relations https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/18 <p><em>In an era characterized by interconnectivity and information flows, the study on the role of soft power in international relations takes center stage as a crucial exploration into the mechanisms through which nations shape perceptions, build influence, and navigate the complexities of the global stage without relying on traditional coercive means. The main objective of this study was to explore the role of soft power in international relations. The study was anchored on the Constructivism Theory. </em><em>The study conducted a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing scholarly works related to </em><em>the role of soft power in international relations. </em><em>This multifaceted process entailed reviewing a diverse range of academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other relevant publications, to acquire a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge within the field. Through a systematic exploration of the literature, researchers gain insights into key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge, which subsequently informs the development of the research framework and questions. This study uncovered a complex and context-specific dynamic. It reveals that successful soft power strategies incorporate diverse elements like cultural diplomacy, economic cooperation, and digital communication. The research underscores the significance of historical narratives, internal policy coherence, and alignment with projected images for effective soft power projection. Beyond enhancing a nation's image, soft power emerges as a tool for fostering diplomatic relations, building global partnerships, and influencing international norms. The findings stress the importance of tailored and adaptive approaches considering unique cultural and historical contexts. In essence, the study contributes to a nuanced understanding of how soft power operates in the intricate landscape of international relations. The study on the role of soft power in international relations concludes by offering a nuanced understanding of the diverse strategies nations employ to project influence globally. The findings underscore the importance of coherence in domestic policies and strategic alignment with projected images for effective soft power. Future research opportunities include exploring the experiences of smaller nations, refining the conceptualization of the soft-hard power relationship, and incorporating robust quantitative methodologies. The study significantly contributes to theoretical understanding by refining frameworks and highlighting the complementary nature of soft and hard power. It also provides valuable policy insights, emphasizing the importance of cultural diplomacy and global engagement for effective soft power strategies. Policymakers can leverage these findings to design initiatives tailored to their nation's strengths and consider the role of non-state actors in shaping soft power. In summary, the study makes substantial contributions to both theoretical discourse and practical policymaking, deepening our understanding of power dynamics in international relations.</em></p> Sharon Charles Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Political Science Studies 2024-01-18 2024-01-18 1 1 25 35 Populism and its Impact on Democratic Institutions https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/19 <p><em>In recent years, the global political landscape has witnessed a surge in populist movements, raising crucial questions about their implications for the health and stability of democratic institutions. This study delves into the complex interplay between populism and democratic governance, seeking to unravel the mechanisms through which populist ideologies and leaders influence the core elements of democratic institutions. By employing a comprehensive approach that combines theoretical insights, empirical analysis, and policy considerations, this research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of populism's impact on the foundations of democracy and offer valuable insights for both academic discourse and practical policy formulation. The main objective of this study was to investigate populism and its impact on democratic institutions. The study was anchored on the Democratic Erosion theory. The study conducted a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing scholarly works related to populism and its impact on democratic institutions</em><em>. </em><em>This multifaceted process entailed reviewing a diverse range of academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other relevant publications, to acquire a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge within the field. Through a systematic exploration of the literature, researchers gain insights into key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge, which subsequently informs the development of the research framework and questions. This study uncovered a complex and context-specific dynamic. This study on concluded that populism, while potentially serving as a corrective force, poses significant threats to democratic norms, with its impact being context-specific. The research highlights the need for nuanced policy responses considering regional variations. It contributes to theory by empirically validating the Democratic Erosion Theory and refining the conceptualization of populism, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors. On a practical level, the study aids policymakers by providing a toolkit for recognizing early indicators of democratic erosion and contributing to media literacy efforts. The policy implications advocate for addressing socio-economic grievances, media regulation, and strengthening checks and balances to counter the appeal of populism. Overall, the study substantially contributes to theoretical understanding, offers practical insights, and provides evidence-based recommendations for policymakers, enriching our comprehension of populism's implications for democratic governance.</em></p> Destiny Ike Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Political Science Studies 2024-01-18 2024-01-18 1 1 36 45 The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Advancing Political Change https://forthworthjournals.org/journals/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/20 <p><em>In an era marked by dynamic global political landscapes, this study delves into the multifaceted and pivotal role played by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in advancing political change, aiming to unravel the complexities, strategies, and impact of civil society engagement on transformative processes across diverse political contexts. The general purpose of this study was to investigate the role of Non- Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in advancing political change. The study was anchored on the Resource Mobilization Theory. The study conducted a comprehensive examination and synthesis of existing scholarly works related to the role of Non- Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in advancing political change. This multifaceted process entailed reviewing a diverse range of academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other relevant publications, to acquire a thorough understanding of the current state of knowledge within the field. Through a systematic exploration of the literature, researchers gain insights into key theories, methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge, which subsequently informs the development of the research framework and questions. The studies collectively revealed that Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) play a crucial role in advancing political change across diverse contexts, utilizing strategies such as advocacy, communication, and collaboration. Whether operating in democratic or authoritarian settings, NGOs contribute to policy change, shape public opinion, influence global governance, and aid in post-conflict reconstruction. The findings underscore the importance of resource mobilization, organizational capacity, and contextual factors in determining NGO effectiveness. However, further research is needed to explore potential unintended consequences and address existing gaps for a more nuanced understanding of their multifaceted role in political change. The studies on the role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in advancing political change make substantial contributions across theory, practice, and policy. They enrich Resource Mobilization Theory by providing empirical evidence on how NGOs strategically mobilize resources, contributing to a deeper understanding of civil society dynamics. Insights into effective NGO strategies offer practical guidance for practitioners, informing organizational approaches and enhancing impact. Policymakers benefit from recommendations on inclusive policy formulation and support for NGOs in post-conflict and electoral contexts. The research also holds implications for international relations, suggesting the importance of recognizing NGOs in global governance. Overall, these studies strengthen democratic processes, contribute to human rights advocacy, and provide a foundation for informed policy decisions in the realm of political change.</em></p> Joshua King Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Political Science Studies 2024-01-18 2024-01-18 1 1 46 55